VIDA
CHICANO LATINO STUDENT SERVICES • LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY
November 4, 1993
Circulation: 2000
Brown’s Assertion: A Need to
Look Critically at World
By Maria Guerrero
On Tuesday, October 9, former
governor of California, Jerry
Brown spoke at Murphy Hall.
Brown’s assertion was that there
is a need to “look critically at the
world.”
According to Brown, this does
not happen in today’s world, es¬
pecially in the realm of politics.
It seems that no one is willing to
“look” or probe at any issue in
great depth. Everything seems
to be for that specific moment.
Brown further stated that “the
political process is the base of
what America is all about.” De¬
mocracy and freedom are two
major components of this politi¬
cal process, but unfortunately,
one politician in particular
made the statement that “...de¬
mocracy and liberty are not
enough.”
In Brown’s eyes, this is when
the American citizen has to be
very careful. Whenever a politi¬
cian in the United States starts
Photo courtesy of Richard Ruelas
Jerry Brown
to contend that “democracy and
freedom” are not sufficient; there
is something going wrong with
the political system.
Brown illustrated his point
further by referring to the media’s
role in society. In Brown’s view,
the media works to “manipulate
reality”, which in turn results in
an “empty and meaningless” ex¬
planations of events, especially
events associated with political
issues.
Also, Brown referred to the
American political system as be¬
ing a plutocracy one in which
“you have one dollar; one vote as
opposed to having one person,
one vote.” He stated that since
1970 to 1990, there have been
12,000 public officials con¬
victed under federal corruption
It seems that no
one is willing to
“look” or probe at
any issue in great
depth.
statutes.” This is a result of the
system that depends on the “top
1% of the country.”
It seemed that Brown was
asking the difficult questions.
According to Brown, only through
honest debate and discussion can
real, fundamental change occur.
But it is evident that this is not
going on in the American politi¬
cal system . Not until the “under¬
lying dynamics” are dealt with
can any real change occur.
Clinton Signs Side
Agreements on NAFTA
Judge Brown Reflects
on Life After College
By Mari sol Barrios
LMU alumna Judge Irma
J. Brown will be speaking
about life after college, her
success story, on Tuesday,
November 9 at Seaver 100
during Convocation Hour.
Presently, Judge Brown is
employed at the Municipal
Court in Compton Judicial
District.
Judge Brown graduated
with a bachelors of art in soci¬
ology in 1970 and continued
to further her education by
attending Loyola Maiymount
University School of Law lo¬
cated in Los Angeles. She
received her Juris Doctorate
in 1973.
“LMU was and is the pri¬
mary foundation for Judge
Brown’s accomplishments.
What she gained from LMU,
she continues to give back to
the university,” stated senior
Kimlin White, Executive Vice
President of Activities Pro¬
gramming Commission.
Part of Judge Brown’s as¬
signments include all the
phases ofthe Municipal Court
Jurisdiction. They include
misdemeanor jury trials,
felony and misdemeanor ar¬
raignments, traffic and small
claims matters, unlawful
detainer cases and other civil
actions.
Judge Brown’s honors and
awards include the past vice-
president of John M. Langston
Bar Association, student body
president of Marymount Col¬
lege, and
СО
and
past president of Black
Women Lawyers Association.
In addition, she received the
Distinguished Alumni LMU
and Distinguished Alumna
David Starr Jordan High
awards.
Presently, she is on the
Board of Regents at LMU and
in the Los Angeles chapter of
Jack and Jill of America.
According to White, Judge
Brown is an ideal role model
because she is committed to
her convictions and in achiev¬
ing her goals.
If you would like to hear
Judge Brown speak about life
after college, come and find
out “From the Inside Out”.
Professors Speak Out on Health Plan
By Sonya Mercado
On Tuesday, September 14,
President Bill Clinton signed the
much-debated compromise side
agreements to the North Ameri¬
can Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA). If passed through Con¬
gress, it will be effective starting
January 1, 1994.
Supporters ofNAFTA propose
that it will promote job growth in
Mexico, the United States and
Canada. Those in favor of the
agreement claim that it will ben¬
efit Mexican workers by stimu¬
lating labor standards, includ¬
ing higher wages, superior to
current working conditions.
They also assert that the pas¬
sage of NAFTA will force the
Mexican government and
SEDESOL, the Environmental
Protection Agency’s (EPA) Mexi¬
can counterpart, to enforce more
strict environmental laws and
regulations.
Opponents, however, argue
that this will be detrimental to
workers’ rights and to the eco¬
nomics of both Mexico and the
United States.
According to AFL-CIO
(American Federation of Labor-
Congress of Industrial Organi¬
zations), President Lane
Kirkland, “President Clinton
sought side agreements to cor¬
rect the problems of the Bush-
negotiated treaty. Unfortu¬
nately, his negotiators failed. The
deal Clinton got contains no prac¬
tical means of safeguarding work¬
ers rights and the environment.”
One of the main grievances of
labor leaders is that the rights of
workers - the right to organize,
child labor, minimum wage,
health and safety - are not prop¬
erly addressed in NAFTA’s
supplemental agreements, and
therefore, will not be enforced in
Mexico.
Economists opposed to the
agreement contend that jobs in
the U.S. will become vulnerable
to relocate to Mexico because of
the lower wages.
According to a study by the
Economic Policy Institute, while
California does not have the high¬
est percentage of potentially vul¬
nerable jobs, it does have the
most unprotected jobs to relo¬
cate with 840,000.
With opposition of unionists
and influential members of
Congress, including House Mi¬
nority Leader Richard Gephardt,
President Clinton and other
NAFTA advocates will have a
difficult time making the free
trade agreement a majority in
Congress.
By Juan Torres and Analee
Zelaya
“Congress hates this
(Clinton’s) plan,becuaseitis com¬
plicated,” comments Dr.
Klinkner. “They do not under¬
stand it and are afraid they will
lose control over legislating.”
On October 5, the Political
Science Association held a dis¬
cussion on Clinton’s New Health
Care Plan. The talk was headed
by Dr. Janie Steckenrider, Dr.
Michael Genovese, and Dr. Philip
Klinkner, political science pro¬
fessors here at Loyola
Marymount University.
The health care plan is obvi¬
ously a very complex matter, but
a trim outline of the components
is somewhat conceivable for stu¬
dents. Maria Gonzalez, senior
and sociology major states, “I
was very confused when I heard
Clinton trying to explain his pi am.
Actually, I think the journalists
were just as confused as I was.”
The plan should be nationally
implementedby January 1, 1997.
Services may be made available
at a sooner date in some states,
with the Clinton Administration
offering incentives, encouraging
states to do so.
The health care plan will be
arranged in regional centers,
called regional health alliances.
The latter will provide informa¬
tion to allow individuals to pick a
plan that ismost suitable to them.
Among other elements, the in¬
formation will be composed of
the names of doctors and hospi¬
tals and the prices of the differ¬
ent health plans.
Benefits of the plan include
coverage for hospitalization,
emergency services, doctors’ vis¬
its, mental health services, home
health care, eye and dental care,
substance abuse treatment, pre¬
scription drugs and rehabilita¬
tion services. These services will
be available to all except illegal
immigrants.
Employers will pay 80% ofthe
standard health plan and em¬
ployees 20%. Additionally, the
employee would be entitled to an
annual deduction of $200.00 per
person or $400.00 for each fam¬
ily under the fee-for-service plan.
Each individual will have the
option of changing plans annu¬
ally. Furthermore, the adminis¬
tration will offer financial fund¬
ing to both low-income individu¬
als and to small businesses with
fewer than 50 employees. Part-
time employees will also receive
assistance from their employers,
depending on the numbers of
hours they work. Self-employed
individuals will pay their entire
premium, but they would be of¬
fered a tax deduction of up to
25% of their health care expenses.
In addition, Medicare and
Medicaid shouldremainthe same
here in California. Hence, indi¬
viduals under these programs
should not be affected by the na¬
tional health plan.
President Clinton is taking
on a great task by attempting to
create a national health plan.
According to the professors, he is
making good on one of his cam¬
paign promises — one that is
very personal to him and Mrs.
Clinton. Many agree that the plan
will be implemented, but the
acb’ustments that will be made to
it remain to be seen. Nonethe¬
less, the United States would be
joining other industrialized na¬
tions by having a national health
care plan.
Source: The Wall Street Jour¬
nal Monday, September 13, 1993
INSIDE VIDAY TODAY
■ Saviors Day 1993:
A Salute to the
Honorable Elijah
Muhammad
■ Latino Unity: Is it
a Contradiction in
terms?
See
раде
4 and 5
■ Latino faculty:
What are their
views? Who are
they?
See page 6
■ When is a man in full
control of the woman?
Does he put her down,
manipulate her body to
his convenience?
See page 7
See page 2