L
О
s
•
A
n
g
e ]
l e
s
LOYOLAN
VOL. 72 - NO. 9
LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY
November 2, 1 994
Capital Campaign to be Announced Nov. 3
University Seeking $128 Million in Funds for
Various Projects; $55 Million Already Pledged
By Kent Janearik
Assistant News Editor
Tomorrow, November 3, Fr. Tho¬
mas O’Malley, S.J., will pub¬
licly announce the the first compre¬
hensive capital campaign in the
University’s history. Thethree-year
$128 million Capital Campaign,
which is the culmination of seven
years’ planning and fundraising, will
be formally announced before
nearly 500 invited guests at the
Regent’s Beverly Wilshi re. Attend¬
ees of the President’s dinner will
include members of the Board of
Trustees, faculty, staff, students,
alumni and contributors to the Uni¬
versity, including the Presidential
Campus
Life
Fright Night Greets 9th
Street Kids
•page 7
Perspective
*
Prop 187, Ad Contro¬
versy, and Somebody
Likes the Loyolan
•page 11
Arts &
Entertainment
The Road to Orange
Juice: Pulp Fiction and
The Road to Wellville
•page 17
Sports
Water Polo in Top
Twenty
•page 19
Associates.
The Capital Campaign includes
three primary objectives, the first of
which is to raise $128 million to
increase the existing endowment
of $147 million by $40 million, pro¬
vide academic support, and pro¬
vide $49 million for the renovation
and construction of various cam¬
pus facilities. The two other princi¬
pal objectives of the campaign in¬
clude elevating the institutional
awareness of Loyola Marymount
University and increasing volun¬
teer involvement to support of the
University’s objectives. The 37-
member LMU Board of Trustees
formally approved the capital cam¬
paign at their October 3 meeting.
University President Fr. O’Malley
described the capital campaign’s
foundation and objectives Monday
as “the culmination of an awful lot of
support and enormous amounts of
planning.” Fr. O’Malley added that
the University’s goal with the capi¬
tal campaign is to become more
competitive and better known, to
increase excellence, and to become
more, rather than less, of a Catho¬
lic institution. Fr. John Rogers,
Director of University Development,
described the capital campaign as
a comprehensive campaign fo¬
cused on “responding to the needs
of the University and increasing
awareness to LMU supporters of
how they can be beneficial to the
University.” Fr. Rogers added that
the campaign is the result of an
extensive internal and external pro¬
cess geared at responding to the
recommendations of the
university’s trustees, volunteers,
and contributors.
AS LMU President Paul Suppa
described the campaign in terms of
its impact upon current and future
LMU students. “I think it’s tremen¬
dous that the University is taking
such proactive steps in the devel¬
opment of University facilities and
relations which will ultimately im¬
pact and benefit all LMU students,
Photo Courtesy of Public Relations
Faculty and Staff members of the University Campaign Committee ,
responsible for raising awareness concerning the Capital Campaign
past, present and future. In terms
of forwarding the mission and ide¬
als of the university, the campaign’s
efforts are a tremendous step for¬
ward,” Suppa noted.
“I am confident that the Univer¬
sity has the resources necessary to
reach its campaign goals, and that
as the University raises contribu¬
tions, awareness of LMU will in¬
crease,” Suppa continued.
The President’s dinner tomor¬
row night will informally mark the
completion of nearly one half of the
targeted fundraising goal of $128
continued on page three
Faculty Senate Opposes Prop 187
Follow Student Senate in
Controversial Proposition
Faculty Reps
Opposition to
By James Keane
News Editor
The Faculty Senate of Loyola
Marymount University voted
October 27 to officially oppose
Proposition 187, an initiative on
next Tuesday’s statewide ballot.
By a 13-0 vote, with five absten¬
tions, the Faculty Senate joined the
is based.”
The resolution was written by Dr.
Dirk Verheyen, Assistant Profes¬
sor of Political Science at LMU and
a member of the Faculty Senate
executive board. ‘The sense was
that the University cannot be an
island unto itself,” Verheyen com¬
mented. “We are part of society
where this issue is on the ballot,
and as a private Catholic univer-
mensions of social issues.’ I hope
the faculty sees this as an ethical
and moral issue, and not a political
oreconomic issue,” noted Dr. Dillon.
“[The Faculty Senate] should pro¬
vide leadership in this situation.
We want to give a direction and let
people know what we stand for.”
‘I hope the faculty sees this as an ethical
and moral issue, and not a political or
economic issue’ — Dr. Matthew Dillon
ASLMU Student Senate in publicly
voicing their opposition to the con- .
troversial anti-illegal immigration
initiative.
The resolution reads as follows:
“Illegal immigration is a serious
public policy issue in California,
requiring a reasonable, effective,
and humane response. The Loyola
Marymount University Faculty Sen¬
ate joins the Senate of the Associ¬
ated Students of Loyola Marymount
University in opposition to Proposi¬
tion 187 on the November 1994
state ballot, because we believe
this measure to be seriously defi¬
cient from the perspectives of en¬
forcement feasibility, constitution¬
ality, and human justice, as well as
incompatible with the teachings and
mission upon which our university
sity, we’re also part of the Catholic
Church which has taken a stand in
opposition to it and the question
arose: Where do we stand?”
The resolution was proposed to
the Faculty Senate by the
President’s Committee on Diver¬
sity, which “felt responsibility to rep¬
resent the conscience of the com¬
munity,” according to Dr. Matthew
Dillon, Associate Professor of Clas¬
sics, President of the Faculty Sen¬
ate, and a member of the
President’s Committee on Diver¬
sity.
“In our Faculty Senate guide¬
book, we state that one of the ways
we participate actively in the life of
the larger community is by ‘provid¬
ing leadership in the examination
and discussion of the ethical di-
Dr. Verheyen expressed his hap¬
piness at the resolution’s passage:
“Some might say that teachers
should just be in the business of
passing on knowledge, but there is
also a moral dimension to teach¬
ing. From the point of view of
justice, constitutionality, and en¬
forceability, this resolution just
doesn’t make a lot of sense.
“Is this really a feasible approach
to the problem of illegal immigra-
continued on page three
- - - — —
U
By James Keane
News Editor
■uthor and educator Frank F.
Wong addressed University
staff and faculty on diversity on
eek as a
sored by
the President’s Committee on
Diversity. Wong, the Provost and
Vice President for Academic Af¬
fairs at the University of Redlands,
has published a number of works
concerning diversity, and is also
in great demand as a speaker for
diversity on college campuses
around the nation.
The President’s Committee on
Diversity sponsored Wong’s
speech as part of the University’s
ongoing commitment to diversity.
Three sessions were scheduled
during the week of October 24-28
to allow staff members and fac¬
ulty the chance te work a session
around their schedules. AThurs-
day9:00-1Q:30a.m. session was
entitled “Seeing beyond the Face:
The Moral Dimensions of Diver¬
sity.” Wednesday's 4:00 — 5:30
p.m. and Thursday 5:00 — 6:30
p.m. sessions were entitled “See¬
ing beyond the Face: Cultural
Democracy in a World of Diver¬
sity.”
The two afternoon sessions at¬
tracted approximately fifty per¬
sons each, while the Thursday
morning session in Murphy Hall
drew over 200.
Dr. Virginia Merriam, Profes¬
sor of Biology and Co-Chair of the
Committee, commented that
Wong was chosen because “he
continued on page four