Volume 67
Issue 1 1
Circulation 3,000
November 15, 1989
Students Overtly Confront Abortion Issue
Pro-Choice
Supported in
Presentation
By Aron D. Little
Senior Writer
Bqyola Marymount received
its first exposure to the pro-
choice movement last Thursday
during convocation hour. The
video, “Abortion: For Survival,”
was shown in Mayer Theater to
an audience of about 20 stu¬
dents.
The video, produced by the
Fund for the Feminist Majority,
largely focused on the dangers of
illegal abortions and how un¬
wanted pregnancies hurt women
and society. Presentations of the
pro-choice and pro-life positions,
followed the video. Students
then discussed their own views
of the video and the issues.
Dr. Ignacio Castuera, a
minister from the United Meth¬
odist Church of Hollywood, pro¬
vided his religious background
to his own pro-choice position. A
former Catholic, Castuera told
of his own experience with
women hying to prevent un¬
wanted births and a brief histoiy
of religious involvement in the
abortion issue.
Dr. Paul Weithman, an As¬
sistant Professor of Philosophy
at LMU, offered the pro-life point
of view. His rebuttal included
issues missed by the video and
the immorality of abortion.
The lecture was organized
by Assistant Professor Judy
Pomer, who has produced sev¬
eral videos on feminist issues.
Her purpose was to “start an
open discussion of the issue,”
and she was impressed with the
“thoughtful discussion” by at¬
tending pro-jife and pro-choice
students.
In organizing this event on a
Catholic campus, Pomer encoun¬
tered little opposition. She com¬
plied with a request by the, Aca¬
demic Vice President, Pr. Albert
Koppes, O. Carm., to provide a
speaker for the pro-life position
after the film. She feels she has
accomplished her goal of sup¬
plying “information so that stu¬
dents canmake their own deci¬
sions.** "
In terms of future pro-choice
events, Pomer said there is “some
talk of beginning an organiza¬
tion” and that next semester she
would like to see a forum on the
issue. “This is a vital issue right
now for women and
families.. .there’s still a lot more
to discuss,” Pomer said.
Щ
please see photo on page 2
LMU Pro-Life
Group Holds
Prayer Vigil
By Robyn Hessinger 1
Assistant Features Editor
Photo by Marie Madariaga
parents, and staff gathered to pray at an abortion clinic in Inglewood.
** T esus hears their silent
О
screams” “Jesus was a fe¬
tus” “Fetuses are people too.”
These were just a few of the
signs carried by members of
Loyola Marymount University’s
Students For Life at the prayer
vigil on Saturday, November
1 1th. The vigil began in Xavier
Hall at 8:00 a.m. with mass,
celebrated by Father Thomas
Buckley, S.J. The thirty-six
students and faculty then pro¬
ceeded to the American Woman’s
Clinic on Manchester Avenue.
The clinic performs preg¬
nancy tests Mondays through
Saturdays, and abortions by
appointment on Wednesdays.
Fridays, and Saturdays. The
clinic offers no counseling.
The Students For Life car¬
ried signs, prayed, and sang
hymns, while offering counsel¬
ing and support. The group’s
goal, along with several “side¬
walk counselors” from Hope
Chapel in Huntington Beach,
was to support the mothers and
pray for the unborn children,
according to William Sahrtni, a
member of the pro-life club.
Over thirty LMU students, faculty i
Many of the students at the
vigil were in training to be side¬
walk counselors. Kieran Sulli¬
van is an LMU senior in Stu¬
dents for Life who participated
in the San Diego Rescue and is
now learning about sidewalk
counseling. “I want to let people
know we’re not going to sit still.
Because there’s a holocaust
going on in America — abortion. *
Sullivan will be sent to Wash¬
ington, D.C. on Tuesday for a 5-
day Operation Rescue project.
A clinic security guard pa¬
trolled the area while the group
walked. Participants were care¬
ful not to block the sidewalk or
trespass on clinic property. Po¬
lice occasionally drove past and
passers-by honked in support
or objection.
At one point, three LMU
students carrying Pro-Choice
signs arrived across the street
from the clinic. The signs dis¬
played such statements as
“Freedom of Speech — Freedom
of Choice” and “Our Bodies Are
Our Own.”
During the security guards’
break, the students crossed the
street and entered the clinic.
But no conflict arose between
the two groups. One of the Pro-
Choice students said, “We were
there because we feel that LMU
should represent both sides of
continued on page 2
Education Amendment-Title IX Affects
Women's Sports at Loyola Marymount
By Ray Watts
Staff Writer
ШШё
IX, a federal statute deal¬
ing with sexual discrimina¬
tion, was recently restored by
Congress after years of relaxed
enforcement.
In 1972, Title IX of the Edu¬
cation Amendment was passed.
It states, “No person in the
United States shall, on the basis
of sex, be excluded from the
participation in, be denied the
benefits of, or be subjected to
discrimination under any edu¬
cation program or activity re¬
ceiving federal financial assis¬
tance.” The act covers almost all
areas within a university, but
according to Lane Bove, Vice
President of Student Affairs,
“Title IX refers primarily to ath¬
letics.”
“On the subject of athlet¬
ics." said Bove, “we have a ways
to go, but we are working on [es¬
tablishing equality!.”
Brian Quinn, Athletic Di¬
rector of Loyola Marymount, ex¬
pressed his views on the Title IX
regulation, stating, “The statute
was enacted in 1972 and many
schools were affected. Santa
Clara and Temple University
each had major legal actions
filed by women's athletic
groups.” Quinn added, “If a
school is found to be in violation
of the statute, any facet of the
university which receives money
can be affected.”
“In the eight years following
the statute, every school
scrambled for equality, but
under Reagan it was not being
enforced. But since Congress
passed the Civil Rights Restora¬
tion Act in 1987, schools are
being watched again very care¬
fully,” stated Quinn.
The chief components of
Title IX are scholarship propor-
ШШшШт
Photo by Peter Taylor
Women's basketball has been directly affected by Title IX .
tlons and benefits. Scholarships donate,
must be allocated proportion- The other component of the
atefy to the number of male and statue Is the benefits which are
female athletes. If the number afforded to all athletes, regard^
of athletes in a school is 60% less of sex. These benefits in¬
male and 40% female, the schol- dude equipment, uniforms,
arship money must be propor- continued on page 2
/
- "
news
Student Affairs Committee
questionnaire . . . page 2
Racial Awareness Days
explained . . .page 2
v_ _ i _
features
Public Safety emphasizes
protection . . . page 4
Monaco promises sun,
romance, studies . . . page 5
opinion
ЕШ:
threatens Leavey
campus . . .page 12
Ronnie's Media Treats: roll
over, play dead . . . page 13
a & e
National dance festival comes
to LMU... page J0
Communion takes oath . . .
page 11
sports ^
1989-1990 Men's basketball
team preview ... pages 8&9
Flag Football playoffs are
ready to be tackled ... page 7
_ _ _ _ J