Los Angeles LOYOLAN
VOL 47 — NO. 4
A LOYOLA-MARYMOUNT STUDENT PUBLICATION
October 27, 1969
FR. THOMAS HANRAHAN, chairman of the Loy ola board of trustees (right) congratulates Fr. Mer-
rifield shortly after his inauguration as the eleventh President of Loyola University. Fr. John Clark,
academic vice-president is looking on.
Marymount student reforms vetoed
Several student proposed innovations that would cause major
policy changes at Marymount College were recently presented to
the Marymount administration. The major proposals were vetoed.
Dorm policy, curfew abolishment and dress regulaiton changes were
among the major areas in question.
On the basis of surveys conducted among both resident and
day students, the Student Council presented a list of 20 proposals
to the first session of the Student Affairs Council on Thursday,
October 16.
Only the first six student pro¬
posals were considered at the
first meeting because of the time
limit involved. The first item
presented was the establishment
of a Resident Standards Board.
This body would act as the gov¬
erning body of the dorm and
first board of appeals for student
complaints concerning violations
of dorm regulations. It would
therefore relieve Student Council
of its responsibilities concerning
dorm life.
The second proposal considered
was the abolition of curfew.
There would be no curfew except
for first semester freshmen, who
would be allowed two overnight
specials per month. This arrange¬
ment would require parental con¬
sent for the remainder of this
academic year, after which time
it would be considered a per¬
manent policy of the College
without this permission.
The third item considered was
the open dorm proposal. The up¬
per floors of the dorm would be
open to male visitors from noon
to eleven on Fridays and Satur¬
days and from noon to five on
Sundays.
Dress regulations were the
fourth proposal on the agenda.
According to the students, capris
should be allowed anywhere on
campus at any time.
The fifth proposal considered
was the formation of an open
forum for the students who are
living three in a room and their
parents. The families and the
College would make some at¬
tempt to make some alteration
in the room fees and to alleviate
the situation in any other way
agreeable to both parties.
(Continued on Page 2)
UM AS tutorial program
gains federal support
By Mike Steed
The Loyola chapter of the United Mexican American Students
(UMAS) is engaged in a unique tutorial program at the La Causa
Youth Center in the heart of the Venice Barrio.
Tony Jimenez, the student director of La Causa, said that the
purpose of the program was twofold.
First, “to motivate Chicano
youth to finish high school so that
they will have the educational
tools necessary to go to college.”
Secondly, “to orientate the Chi¬
cano youth to the needs of the
Merrifield inaugurated
as new Loyola president
On Wednesday, Oct. 22, Fr. Donald Merrifield, S.J., was inau¬
gurated in Sacred Heart Chapel as the eleventh president of Loy¬
ola University of Los Angeles.
The ceremonies began shortly after 9:00 Wednesday morning
with the arrival of various invited guests. Among those in attend¬
ance were the representatives of over 25 colleges and universities
in Southern California.
Fr. Albert Jonsen began the
Mass, and following the Gospel
reading by Fr. St. Clair, S.J., rec¬
tor of the community, Fr. Thomas
Hanrahan, chairman of the Board
of Trustees, officially invested Fr.
Donald Merrifield, S.J., as the
eleventh president in succession
since the founding of Loyola Uni¬
versity.
The newly coronated president
then addressed the gathering, and
changed from his academic robes
into his vestments to continue the
Mass.
Upon conclusion of the mass,
benediction was given by Dr.
John E. Cantelon, director of the
Theology Department at the Uni¬
versity of Southern California.
A presidential reception on the
Regents Terrace immediately fol¬
lowing Mass found Fr. Merrifield
swamped by crowds of anxious
well-wishers. The greeting party
included Mr. and Mrs. Arthur S.
Merrifield, who patiently waited
(Continued on Page 2)
Father’s invited guests num¬
bered over 250, among whom
were his personal friends andfam-
ily, Loyola-Marymount Trustees,
Loyola Trustees and Regents, and
faculty. Marymount students also
attended the inauguration, though
not in overwhelming numbers.
Special guests included F.R
Thomas Terry, S.J., President of
Santa Clara University, and Fr.
Albert Jonsen, S.J., President of
the University of San Francisco.
The vesting in the President’s
Lounge was followed by the tradi¬
tional academic procession, which
formed on Regents Terrace. Led
by master of ceremonies, Joe
Deems, the march made its way
into Sacred Heart Chapel.
Once the guests were seated in¬
side the chapel, Joe Deems in¬
troduced Rabbi Alfred Wolf of the
Wilshire Boulevard Temple. The
Rabbi gave a short invocation,
and then Fr. John Clark, on be¬
half of Fr. Merrifield, welcomed
the distinguished guests to Loyo¬
la.
community and how the/ can help win be 30 students being tutored.
the community.
David Luna, President of
UMAS, explained that the Uni¬
versity has hired Mr. Victor Gar¬
cia to head the project. Mr. Gar¬
cia graduated from Cal State LA
where he received his BA in So¬
ciology.
Last summer Garcia headed the
Service Employment and Re¬
development Agency in Venice.
Along with his work in La Causa
Garcia is attending classes at
UCLA toward his masters.
Mr. Garcia and Tony Jimenez
have the important job of inter-
LUCAP speaker talks on
racism in Chicano schools
By Bob Baker
Racism in the schools of Chi¬
cano communities was the topic
of discussion at the LUCAP spon¬
sored fdrum last Tuesday.
The Rev. Vahac Mardirosian,
chairman of the Mexican-Amer-
can educational committee, spoke
to a small group of Loyola-Mary¬
mount students last Tuesday on
viewing both prospective students
from Venice and prospective tu¬
tors fro m Loyola-Marymount.
Jimenez said that as soon as the
program is fully operative there
The actual Youth Center is a
house which has been purchased
by UMAS in Venice. The house
will be open from 1 to 9 every day
for tutoring.
Luna expressed hope that the
program could be expanded “to
include adult education courses
for Mexican-Americans, teaching
them English and getting them
ready for their citizenship ex¬
ams.”-
Funding for the program is pres¬
ently coming from four different
sources.
(Continued on Page 2)
Rev. Vahac Madrosian
the Lair patio.
Fr. Madrosian used the Mexi-
can-American elementary schools
as an example of this racism. He
said that most of these schools
are being run in a 1935 attitude,
discriminating against the Chi-
canos.
Fr. Madirosian’s plan is to give
the Chicano students a better
education by improving teachers’
skill in teaching minority chil¬
dren. He said that the teachers of
Chicano children must learn their
language and adopt to their ways
before they can teach them effec¬
tively.
He believes that teacher ex¬
pectations of pupil achievements
are an important factor in decid¬
ing whether or not children ac¬
quire the necessary basic skills in
the English language.
Rev. Madirosian further main¬
tained that if the teachers do not
have the skills to handle Mexican-
American children, spending of
additional time on reading in¬
struction will not be effective.
He suggested a program of
monthly reading tests for Chi¬
cano students which would pro¬
vide some measurements of any
progress being made through a
revised educational program.
According to Fr. Marirosian,
“the message is getting to some
people that no progress what¬
soever is being made in the school
districts at present.”
He advocated a program of non¬
violent change in this area, but
warned that if no results come,
eventually the non-violent people
will be “pushed out” by more
radical reformers who are tired of
waiting.